Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    Button
    • NEWS
    • BUSINESS
    • KNOW YOUR CELEBRITY
    • POLITICS
    • TECHNOLOGY
    • SPORTS
    • HOW-TO
    • WORLD NEWS
    KahawatunguKahawatungu

    Cofek To Appeal Court Ruling Invalidating Interest Rate Cap Laws

    Francis MuliBy Francis MuliMarch 19, 2019No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Cofek Secretary General Stephen Mutoro. [PHOTO/ COURTESY]
    Share
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Pinterest Email Copy Link

    The Consumers Federation of Kenya (Cofek) has said that it will appeal a High Court decision that declared the interest rate capping laws unconstitutional.

    The consumer body faulted the judgement terming it as grossly defective, suspect and one that raises serious integrity questions on the part of Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) and Kenya Bankers Association (KBA).

    “We intend to appeal to the Court of Appeal against the said judgment to the extent  that the decision by the superior Court found provisions in the Act to be vague imprecise, ambiguous indefinite  and its declaration that Section 33B (1) and (2) of the Banking Act are null and void,’’ the notice by Cofek read.

    In the ruling delivered last week, High Court judges Francis Tuiyott, Rachel Ngetich and Jacqueline Kamau ruled that the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) will continue regulating the rates for 12 months after which the judgement will take effect.

    “Mindful of the possible ramifications and disruption on existing contractual relationships between banks and their customers, the court suspended the effect of the declaration for 12 months from the date of this decision to give the National Assembly an opportunity to reconsider the provisions,” the judges ruled.

    Read: Court Declares Bank Interest Rate Cap Laws Unconstitutional

    Of the sections affected most include section 33B (1) and (2) of the Banking Act which were declared vague for trying to cap income for banks from their customers.

    Section 33(B) of the Act was declared discriminatory against banks’ CEOs, for providing a punishment in the event they breached the interest rate caps law.

    The petitioner, Mr Boniface Oduor through lawyer Miller Wanjala, said that the parliament overlapped the duties of CBK in determining the maximum interest rates banks should charge on loans.

    However, Cofek says that the petitioner does not represent the interests of the customers.

    “Indeed it is clear that the petitioner, one Bonface Oduor, does not represent interest of bank customers but those of CBK and KBA,” Cofek said.

    Email your news TIPS to Editor@kahawatungu.com or WhatsApp +254707482874. You can also find us on Telegram through www.t.me/kahawatungu

    Email your news TIPS to Editor@Kahawatungu.com — this is our only official communication channel

    Follow on Facebook Follow on X (Twitter)
    Share. Facebook Twitter WhatsApp LinkedIn Telegram Email
    Francis Muli
    • Website
    • Facebook
    • X (Twitter)
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn

    Follow me on Twitter @francismuli_ Email: Editor@Kahawatungu.com

    Comments are closed.

    Latest Posts

    CS Wahome Forms Multi-Agency Team to Demarcate Nairobi Rivers Corridor

    December 20, 2025

    Government Extends Security-Disturbed Status in Parts of Marsabit

    December 20, 2025

    Prof. Clara Momanyi Appointed Chair of KU Council

    December 20, 2025

    10 Stripped of Chief of the Order of the Burning Spear Honour

    December 20, 2025

    Erik Per Sullivan Net Worth

    December 20, 2025

    Ruto Renews Faith Boinett’s Term as Kenya Pipeline Board Chair

    December 20, 2025

    Woman fatally stabbed in domestic fight in Kuresoi

    December 20, 2025

    How To Dress A Newborn In Summer

    December 20, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2025 Kahawatungu.com. Designed by Okii.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.