Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    Button
    • NEWS
    • BUSINESS
    • KNOW YOUR CELEBRITY
    • POLITICS
    • TECHNOLOGY
    • SPORTS
    • HOW-TO
    • WORLD NEWS
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    COURT NEWS

    Judge says creation of offices for Ruto’s 21 advisers unconstitutional

    KahawaTungu ReporterBy KahawaTungu ReporterJanuary 22, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Pinterest Email Copy Link

    High Court judge Bahati Mwamuye declared the creation of offices for 21 advisers to the President unconstitutional, faulting the process used to establish the positions and appoint the office holders.

    The court found that the actions leading to the establishment of the advisory offices by the first and second respondents were unlawful, rendering the appointments of all 21 advisers null and void.

    The judge issued orders quashing the decision to create the advisory positions and to appoint individuals to occupy the offices, effectively removing the advisers from their roles.

    Further, the court issued a permanent injunction barring the respondents from effecting or processing any payments, salaries, or benefits to the 21 advisers.

    The court also directed that a comprehensive audit be conducted on all offices established during the period in question to verify their compliance with the Constitution, relevant laws, and public service regulations.

    Additionally, the respondents were ordered to conduct and complete the audit and file a progress report with the court within 120 days.

    The case was filed by Katiba Institute and lawyer Vincent Lampaa Suyiaka, who challenged the creation of the said offices.

    After the judgement the respondents, including the Salaries and Remuneration Commission (SRC) lawyer, asked for a stay of 30  days, saying that some officers will be required to hand over some reports.

    “It’s just a transitional period that they do the handover and any assignments that are undertaken, the petitioners stand not to suffer and harm,” they said.

    However, the petitioners objected, saying that the judgment does not prevent them from handing over and that they have been earning salaries in unconstitutional offices.

    The judge declined to stay the execution of the judgement adding that the oral application for stay was declined.

    Email your news TIPS to Editor@Kahawatungu.com — this is our only official communication channel

    Follow on Facebook Follow on X (Twitter)
    Share. Facebook Twitter WhatsApp LinkedIn Telegram Email
    KahawaTungu Reporter
    • Website

    Email: Editor@Kahawatungu.com

    Related Posts

    JSC nominates 24 High Court and 13 Environment and Land Court judges for appointment

    April 10, 2026

    JSC Nominates 37 Judges to High Court and Environment and Land Court

    April 10, 2026

    Appeals court reinstates Kiambu land ownership to Briton

    April 10, 2026

    Comments are closed.

    Latest Posts

    Asha Bhosle: The sound of Bollywood dies aged 92

    April 13, 2026

    KNH assures public of continued services amid nurses’ strike concerns

    April 13, 2026

    After Iran talks falter, the big question is what happens next?

    April 13, 2026

    Murkomen says IG to send special police unit to deal with criminal gangs in Kitale

    April 13, 2026

    Justin Bieber headlines Coachella with nostalgia-fuelled set

    April 13, 2026

    At least 30 feared dead in crush at Haitian tourist site

    April 13, 2026

    How to Buy a Vacation Home Abroad

    April 13, 2026

    The Dos and Don’ts of Cash Management

    April 13, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2026 Kahawatungu.com. Designed by Okii.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.