Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    Button
    • NEWS
    • BUSINESS
    • KNOW YOUR CELEBRITY
    • POLITICS
    • TECHNOLOGY
    • SPORTS
    • HOW-TO
    • WORLD NEWS
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    COURT NEWS

    Kenyan Sues X Over Harmful Content Online

    Pinnah MokeiraBy Pinnah MokeiraJanuary 15, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Pinterest Email Copy Link

    A Kenyan citizen has sued X Corp, the owner of the social media platform “X” (formerly Twitter), accusing the company of enabling the spread of harmful and inappropriate content in Kenya.

    In the petition filed under certificate of urgency, the petitioner claims that the platform is awash with content promoting pornography, hate speech, incitement to violence, and violations of privacy.

    “The X corp has with the sole end of profiteering allowed, entertained, encouraged, acquiesced in and/or promoted in its social media platform “X” (formerly Twitter) the publication and access in Kenya of content that constitutes hate speech, incitement to violence, advocacy of hatred that constitutes ethnic incitement, vilification,” read the court documents.

    Felix Kibet who has also sued Attorney General Dorcas Oduor, Communication Authority of Kenya (CAK), the Kenya film classification board KFCB (KFCB), National Cohesion and Integration Commission (NCIC) and Office of Data Protection Commission allege that they have failed to discharge their constitutional and statutory mandate, abetting the illegal and unconstitutional acts of the platform.

    “The acts of the 1st Respondent are in contravention of Article 156 (4 ) (a) and (6) of the Constitution, Section 46 (A) of the Kenya Information and Communications Act, 1998, Section 15 (1) (a) of the Film and Stage Plays Act, Section 25 (1) of the National Integration and Cohesion Act and Section 6 & 25 of the Data Protection Act, 2019 respectively,” says Kibet.

    Kibet criticized the platform for allowing users to create and operate pseudo accounts using aliases, fake names, and even the identities of others, including their photos.

    High Court judge justice Bahati Mwamuye heard that the platform’s permissive features, that include the ability for users to post writings, photos, and videos without adequate regulation has become a breeding ground for vulgarity, obscenity, and unregulated discourse.

    “The 1st Respondent’s social media platform “X” (formerly Twitter) permit users to make posts in the form of writings, photos and videos. Further through its versatile feature called “Spaces” it permits users to have ungoverned live-streamed audio conversations on any topic around the sun, at any time using any character of language including vulgarity and obscenity,” read the court documents. 

    He now wants the court to restrain the X corp from permitting the publication and access in Kenya of content that is showing, or advertising pornography, nudity and lewdness.

    Kibet also wants the X corp restrained from permitting the publication and access in Kenya of content that constitutes hate speech, incitement to violence, advocacy of hatred that constitutes ethnic incitement, vilification of others or incitement to cause harm.

    “Pending the hearing and determination of this application inter-partes, a conservatory order do and is hereby issued restraining the 1st Respondent, from permitting the publication and access in Kenya of content that is showing, directing to and/or advertising pornography, nudity and lewdness in its social media platform “X” (formerly Twitter),” read the court documents.

    “Unless the Honourable court urgently intervenes by granting the orders sought herein, the 1st Respondent will persist in its violation of Kenyans’ human rights and contravention of the Constitution, the consequences of which are dire,” the papers add.

    The court directed the Petitioner to serve the Application, Petition, and associated Directions on the Respondents by close of business on January 22, and to file an Affidavit(s) of Service by January 24, 2025.

    The Respondents have been ordered to file and serve their responses to both the Application and Petition by close of business February 7.

    The Petitioner will also be allowed to file and serve a rejoinder, if necessary, by February 14.

    The court has scheduled a mention on February 19, to confirm compliance with the timelines and to issue further directions.

    Email your news TIPS to Editor@Kahawatungu.com — this is our only official communication channel

    Felix Kibet Harmful Content X
    Follow on Facebook Follow on X (Twitter)
    Share. Facebook Twitter WhatsApp LinkedIn Telegram Email
    Pinnah Mokeira

    Related Posts

    Court finds Mackenzie has case to answer in Shakahola case 

    April 2, 2026

    NTSA in court, seeks case challenging rollout of instant traffic fines be withdrawn

    April 2, 2026

    Los Angeles Auto Accident Lawyers: Navigating Legal Challenges After a Crash

    March 31, 2026

    Comments are closed.

    Latest Posts

    What Is Conan O’Brien Net Worth?

    April 6, 2026

    Savannah Guthrie Returns to ‘Today’ Show

    April 6, 2026

    Willson Contreras Siblings: All About Willmer and William Contreras

    April 6, 2026

    George Springer Siblings: Meet Nicole and Lena Springer

    April 6, 2026

    Kodai Senga Siblings: Get to Know Kotono Senga

    April 6, 2026

    Sonny Gray Siblings: Meet the Siblings Squad Behind the Baseball Player

    April 6, 2026

    Grant Holmes Siblings: Getting to Know Colby Holmes

    April 6, 2026

    Brett Baty Siblings: Get to Know Jordyn and Lauren Baty

    April 6, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2026 Kahawatungu.com. Designed by Okii.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.