Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    Button
    • NEWS
    • BUSINESS
    • KNOW YOUR CELEBRITY
    • POLITICS
    • TECHNOLOGY
    • SPORTS
    • HOW-TO
    • WORLD NEWS
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    WORLD NEWS

    Palestine Action ban is lawful, Court of Appeal rules

    Oki Bin OkiBy Oki Bin OkiJune 15, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Palestine Action ban is lawful, Court of Appeal rules
    Share
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Pinterest Email Copy Link

    The government’s proscription of Palestine Action as a terror organisation is lawful, the Court of Appeal has ruled. In one of the most significant rulings on national security in recent years, five of the most senior judges in the country overturned an earlier decision from the High Court that the ban had breached the right to protest and had been incorrectly taken by ministers.

    Palestine Action has remained banned since that ruling in February to allow for further legal arguments and give the government time to consider an appeal.

    But at a hearing on Monday, five Court of Appeal judges concluding the government’s decision to proscribe the group “struck a fair balance”.

    The proscription made it a criminal offence to belong to or support Palestine Action, punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

    Thousands of people have been arrested at demonstrations in the months since the ban came into force in July last year.

    Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr and four other judges said that the government’s policy on banning terrorism groups meant the home secretary had been legally entitled to decide the group should be proscribed – although an attempt to appeal this to the Supreme Court is now likely.

    She said it was not a “sustainable proposition” to portray it as a non-violent protest group.

    “Palestine Action overly promotes unlawful violence that amounts to terrorism… It is not like the Suffragettes,” she said.

    She said the group had neither disowned nor condemned three incidents so far judged by ministers to amount to terrorism.

    The threats posed by Palestine Action had been the most important factor in the lawful decision-making, Baroness Carr said, including how the group clandestinely organised and targeted lawful businesses.
    That included defence firms involved in UK national defence and assisting Ukraine. The home secretary had been best placed to judge the impact of those threats, said the court.

    By BBC News

    Email your news TIPS to Editor@Kahawatungu.com — this is our only official communication channel

    Follow on Facebook Follow on X (Twitter)
    Share. Facebook Twitter WhatsApp LinkedIn Telegram Email
    Oki Bin Oki

    Related Posts

    What happens next after Lindsay Clancy’s murder case ends in a mistrial?

    September 5, 2026

    Trump’s peace envoys to visit Moscow and Kyiv over weekend

    September 5, 2026

    UN votes to adopt new map that makes our world look very different

    September 5, 2026

    Comments are closed.

    Latest Posts

    What happens next after Lindsay Clancy’s murder case ends in a mistrial?

    September 5, 2026

    Trump’s peace envoys to visit Moscow and Kyiv over weekend

    September 5, 2026

    UN votes to adopt new map that makes our world look very different

    September 5, 2026

    Romanian prosecutors indict Andrew Tate for trafficking minors, money laundering

    September 5, 2026

    Manduku urges Gusii to back Ruto, says Matiang’i has been left hanging

    September 5, 2026

    Stock up on food to prepare for extreme weather, minister says

    September 5, 2026

    Trump asks Supreme Court to OK sweeping changes for mail ballots

    September 5, 2026

    Fox News abruptly ousts Maria Bartiromo, a longtime Trump ally

    September 5, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2026 Kahawatungu.com. Designed by Okii.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.