Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    Button
    • NEWS
    • BUSINESS
    • KNOW YOUR CELEBRITY
    • POLITICS
    • TECHNOLOGY
    • SPORTS
    • HOW-TO
    • WORLD NEWS
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    WORLD NEWS

    US judge halts Trump’s $1.8bn ‘anti-weaponisation’ fund

    Oki Bin OkiBy Oki Bin OkiMay 30, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Pinterest Email Copy Link

    A federal judge has temporarily stopped the creation of a $1.8bn government fund to compensate individuals who claimed to be targets of political investigation by previous presidential administrations. In a two-page order on Friday, the judge barred the justice department from taking any steps to stand up or operate the fund – including processing or dispersing claims – until a preliminary hearing on 12 June.

    Last week, the justice department announced it was establishing what it called the “anti-weaponisation fund”.

    It was part of an agreement with President Donald Trump to end his $10bn lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) over the leak of his tax returns.

    While the memorandum creating the fund did not detail how individuals could qualify for payments, many Trump supporters who were prosecuted over the US Capitol riot on 6 January 2021 have said they plan to seek compensation. The creation of the fund prompted outcry from Democrats and some Republicans who were concerned that it did not have explicit congressional approval and would operate with little oversight.

    John Thune, the Republican leader in the Senate, said he was not a “big fan” of the fund and that he was unclear on how claims would be processed.

    The Virginia lawsuit was filed by two men who alleged the fund was discriminatory. They said they had been targeted for political retribution by the Trump administration but believed the administration would not allow them to file claims for compensation.

    It is one of several legal challenges to the fund currently being considered by federal courts.
    On Wednesday, a group of 35 former federal judges wrote a letter to the judge who oversaw Trump’s tax lawsuit, asking her to review the terms of the deal more thoroughly.

    The terms of the deal also block the IRS from reviewing tax filings that Trump, his family and his businesses made in the past.

    By BBC News

    Stay connected via Google News
    Follow us for the latest news updates and guides.
    Add as preferred source on Google

    Email your news TIPS to Editor@Kahawatungu.com — this is our only official communication channel

    Follow on Facebook Follow on X (Twitter)
    Share. Facebook Twitter WhatsApp LinkedIn Telegram Email
    Oki Bin Oki

    Related Posts

    Trump signs sweeping Russia sanctions bill 

    September 19, 2026

    Grim discoveries of murdered women spark fear in South Africa

    September 19, 2026

    US and Denmark reach deal over Greenland after Trump annexation threats

    September 19, 2026

    Comments are closed.

    Latest Posts

    Millicent Omanga Clarifies Govt Appointment

    September 19, 2026

    Ruto, CSs Make Fresh Appointments to State Boards

    September 19, 2026

    Gun holder shoots suspect dead after phone theft in Kawangware

    September 19, 2026

    Esteban Loaiza Net Worth

    September 19, 2026

    Aaron Harang Net Worth

    September 19, 2026

    Bronson Arroyo Net Worth

    September 19, 2026

    Tim Wakefield Net Worth

    September 19, 2026

    John Smoltz Net Worth

    September 19, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2026 Kahawatungu.com. Designed by Okii.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.