Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    Button
    • NEWS
    • BUSINESS
    • KNOW YOUR CELEBRITY
    • POLITICS
    • TECHNOLOGY
    • SPORTS
    • HOW-TO
    • WORLD NEWS
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    COURT NEWS

    Activists move to Supreme Court over ruling on NG-CDF

    Pinnah MokeiraBy Pinnah MokeiraFebruary 6, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Activists move to Supreme Court over ruling on NG-CDF
    Activists move to Supreme Court over ruling on NG-CDF
    Share
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Pinterest Email Copy Link

    Activists Wanjiru Gikonyo and Cornelius Oduor Opuot moved to the Supreme Court after the Court of Appeal reinstated the National Government Constituencies Development Fund (NG-CDF).

    Through their lawyer, Joshua Malidzo Nyawa, the activists filed a Notice of Appeal declaring they are “aggrieved by the entire judgment” delivered by Court of Appeal judges Daniel Musinga, Francis Tuiyott and Aggrey Muchelule.

    According to the notice, they intend to challenge all findings and orders issued by the appellate court.

    The Court of Appeal ruling, delivered on Friday February 6, 2026, overturned a September 2024 High Court judgment that had declared the NG-CDF Act unconstitutional and ordered the fund to wind up operations by June 30, 2026.

    In reinstating the law, the appellate court found the High Court erred by invalidating the entire act without sufficiently demonstrating how specific provisions conflicted with the Constitution.

    The judges held that the NG-CDF does not undermine devolution or improperly transfer county functions to the national government, ruling that the fund forms part of national government expenditure approved annually by Parliament.

    However, the appellate bench struck down Section 43(9) of the Act, which tied the tenure of constituency fund managers to the life of Parliament, ruling that it violated the principle of separation of powers.

    The dispute originates from a constitutional petition filed by the activists challenging the NG-CDF framework.

    They argued the law allows Members of Parliament to influence development project implementation , functions they said constitutionally belong to the executive and county governments.

    In the 2024 ruling, the High Court found that the NG-CDF undermined devolution, blurred separation of powers and bypassed constitutional public finance and legislative processes.

    Email your news TIPS to Editor@Kahawatungu.com — this is our only official communication channel

    Follow on Facebook Follow on X (Twitter)
    Share. Facebook Twitter WhatsApp LinkedIn Telegram Email
    Pinnah Mokeira

    Related Posts

    Child trafficking suspect arraigned as police rescue 22 girls in Mombasa

    May 21, 2026

    Court Upholds Mbeere North MP’s Election, Dismisses Petition Challenging Results

    May 21, 2026

    Suspect in murder of gospel artist Wandeto detained for 10 days pending probe 

    May 21, 2026

    Comments are closed.

    Latest Posts

    Child trafficking suspect arraigned as police rescue 22 girls in Mombasa

    May 21, 2026

    How Trump’s IRS settlement could block tax audits of him, his family and their businesses

    May 21, 2026

    India has a new political superstar – a cockroach

    May 21, 2026

    DR Congo cancels World Cup training camp over Ebola outbreak

    May 21, 2026

    Ebola vaccine could take nine months as death toll rises further, WHO warns

    May 21, 2026

    Why Free Malware Removal and Windows Antivirus Tools Matter in 2026

    May 21, 2026

    Beatbot AquaSense X vs AquaSense 2 Ultra: Which One Should You Choose?

    May 21, 2026

    KNH Introduces Advanced Technology for Haemorrhoids Treatment

    May 21, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2026 Kahawatungu.com. Designed by Okii.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.