Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    Button
    • NEWS
    • BUSINESS
    • KNOW YOUR CELEBRITY
    • POLITICS
    • TECHNOLOGY
    • SPORTS
    • HOW-TO
    • WORLD NEWS
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    COURT NEWS

    Court dismisses petition on constitutionality of mandatory death sentence

    Pinnah MokeiraBy Pinnah MokeiraNovember 6, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Pinterest Email Copy Link

    The High Court on Thursday dismissed a petition challenging the constitutionality of the mandatory death sentence.

    Justice Lawrence Mugambi also declined to hear a fresh sentencing request by the petitioner.

    Justice Mugambi ruled that the petition lacked merit and that the High Court had no jurisdiction to revisit a matter that had already been determined by a court of superior jurisdiction.

    The petition, filed on October 31, 2024, was supported by affidavits dated November 19, 2024, and sought to have the petitioner’s case reheard so that his mitigating circumstances could be considered.

    The petitioner Byron Robert, argued that the mandatory death sentence violated his constitutional rights under Articles 27, 28, 29, and 50 of the Constitution.

    Justice Mugambi said that the petitioner had previously filed a re-sentencing application Miscellaneous Criminal Application No. 82 of 2019, which was heard and dismissed by Justice Kimaru in September 2020.

    In that ruling, the court had held that it lacked jurisdiction to revisit the sentence since the matter had already been determined by the Court of Appeal in Civil Appeal No. 90 of 2017.

    Justice Mugambi held that once the Court of Appeal has pronounced itself on a matter, a lower court cannot reopen or vary that decision.

    He further said that the High Court could not review or reverse the findings of a superior court, as doing so would violate the principle of functus officio which bars a court from reopening a case it has already concluded.

    “The fact that a re-sentencing application was heard and determined by this court is not in dispute. It cannot be revisited under the principle of functus officio. Filing a constitutional petition does not change this fact,” Justice Mugambi said.

    He said Article 165(6) of the Constitution prohibits the High Court from exercising supervisory jurisdiction over superior courts, adding that the petitioner’s remedy lay in pursuing an appeal at the Court of Appeal.

    Email your news TIPS to Editor@Kahawatungu.com — this is our only official communication channel

    Death Sentence
    Follow on Facebook Follow on X (Twitter)
    Share. Facebook Twitter WhatsApp LinkedIn Telegram Email
    Pinnah Mokeira

    Related Posts

    Court extends detention of Iranian crew in Sh8 billion drug trafficking probe

    December 4, 2025

    Two sue Kenyatta University VC over claims of mismanagement 

    December 4, 2025

    Court rules Ruto acted outside his powers in formation of compensation team

    December 4, 2025

    Comments are closed.

    Latest Posts

    Sofia Boutella Net Worth

    December 5, 2025

    Annabelle Wallis Net Worth

    December 5, 2025

    Anya Taylor-Joy Net Worth

    December 5, 2025

    Aaron Taylor-Johnson Net Worth

    December 5, 2025

    Thugs fatally attack guard at construction site in Kajiado

    December 5, 2025

    Missing Nandi politician found alive in Uganda

    December 5, 2025

    Grand jury declines to charge Letitia James after first case dismissed

    December 5, 2025

    US Supreme Court allows Texas to use redrawn voting maps in midterms

    December 5, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2025 Kahawatungu.com. Designed by Okii.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.