Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    Button
    • NEWS
    • BUSINESS
    • KNOW YOUR CELEBRITY
    • POLITICS
    • TECHNOLOGY
    • SPORTS
    • HOW-TO
    • WORLD NEWS
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    COURT NEWS

    Court dismisses petition on constitutionality of mandatory death sentence

    Pinnah MokeiraBy Pinnah MokeiraNovember 6, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Pinterest Email Copy Link

    The High Court on Thursday dismissed a petition challenging the constitutionality of the mandatory death sentence.

    Justice Lawrence Mugambi also declined to hear a fresh sentencing request by the petitioner.

    Justice Mugambi ruled that the petition lacked merit and that the High Court had no jurisdiction to revisit a matter that had already been determined by a court of superior jurisdiction.

    The petition, filed on October 31, 2024, was supported by affidavits dated November 19, 2024, and sought to have the petitioner’s case reheard so that his mitigating circumstances could be considered.

    The petitioner Byron Robert, argued that the mandatory death sentence violated his constitutional rights under Articles 27, 28, 29, and 50 of the Constitution.

    Justice Mugambi said that the petitioner had previously filed a re-sentencing application Miscellaneous Criminal Application No. 82 of 2019, which was heard and dismissed by Justice Kimaru in September 2020.

    In that ruling, the court had held that it lacked jurisdiction to revisit the sentence since the matter had already been determined by the Court of Appeal in Civil Appeal No. 90 of 2017.

    Justice Mugambi held that once the Court of Appeal has pronounced itself on a matter, a lower court cannot reopen or vary that decision.

    He further said that the High Court could not review or reverse the findings of a superior court, as doing so would violate the principle of functus officio which bars a court from reopening a case it has already concluded.

    “The fact that a re-sentencing application was heard and determined by this court is not in dispute. It cannot be revisited under the principle of functus officio. Filing a constitutional petition does not change this fact,” Justice Mugambi said.

    He said Article 165(6) of the Constitution prohibits the High Court from exercising supervisory jurisdiction over superior courts, adding that the petitioner’s remedy lay in pursuing an appeal at the Court of Appeal.

    Email your news TIPS to Editor@Kahawatungu.com — this is our only official communication channel

    Death Sentence
    Follow on Facebook Follow on X (Twitter)
    Share. Facebook Twitter WhatsApp LinkedIn Telegram Email
    Pinnah Mokeira

    Related Posts

    Laikipia County opposes Ebola quarantine facility over public health concerns

    June 8, 2026

    How Bail Bonds Work for Felony vs Misdemeanor Charges

    June 7, 2026

    Judges say Maraga’s advisory on Parliament dissolution unconstitutional

    June 6, 2026

    Comments are closed.

    Latest Posts

    Texas teen sentenced to 35 years for killing fellow student at athletics event

    June 10, 2026

    Norway crown princess’s son to stay in custody before rape verdict, says court

    June 10, 2026

    US inflation surges to three-year high of 4.2%

    June 10, 2026

    Reimagining Financial Services: How Digital Solutions Drive Growth and Efficiency

    June 10, 2026

    What’s Driving High-End Foreign Buyers to San Miguel de Allende

    June 10, 2026

    Hannah Herzsprung Siblings: Get to Know Sara Herzsprung

    June 10, 2026

    Joanna Kulig Siblings: All About Justyna Schneider

    June 10, 2026

    August Diehl Siblings: Getting to Know Jakob Diehl

    June 10, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2026 Kahawatungu.com. Designed by Okii.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.