Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    Button
    • NEWS
    • BUSINESS
    • KNOW YOUR CELEBRITY
    • POLITICS
    • TECHNOLOGY
    • SPORTS
    • HOW-TO
    • WORLD NEWS
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    NEWS

    Court dismisses petition over appointment of Appeals judges

    Pinnah MokeiraBy Pinnah MokeiraSeptember 18, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Three detained over Sh10 million theft from Safaricom Sacco bank account
    Three detained over Sh10 million theft from Safaricom Sacco bank account
    Share
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Pinterest Email Copy Link

    The High Court dismissed a petition challenging the Judicial Service Commission’s (JSC) appointment of judges to the Court of Appeal.

    It ruled that the process was lawful and within the confines of the Constitution.

    The petitioner, Busia Senator Okiya Omtatah had argued that the JSC unlawfully recruited seven judges instead of six, contrary to its earlier advertisement.

    Omtatah claimed the process discriminated against judges from the Environment and Land Court and the Employment and Labour Relations Court.

    It was further alleged that the JSC’s actions violated constitutional provisions on transparency, accountability, and equality, and that the appointments marginalized judges of special courts.

    However, Justice Lawrence Mugambi held that a fresh vacancy had arisen during the recruitment exercise following the retirement of Justice Roselyn Nambuye, making it prudent for the JSC to fill the additional slot from candidates who had already been shortlisted and interviewed.

    Mugambi said that this saved public costs of fresh recruitment, avoided unnecessary delay, and addressed the severe backlog at the Court of Appeal, where only 15 out of the required 30 judges were in office.

    The court ruled that the JSC has the constitutional mandate to regulate its own procedures and make decisions necessary for the efficient administration of justice.

    The judge ruled that the Commission acted reasonably, in good faith, and in line with constitutional values of integrity, transparency, and merit-based appointments.

    On the allegation of bias and discrimination, the court ruled neither the Constitution nor the Judicial Service Act reserves slots for judges from specific courts and that all applicants were evaluated based on objective criteria including competence, integrity, and suitability.

    “The petitioner did not discharge the burden of proof required to demonstrate discrimination or breach of constitutional provisions. The allegation therefore fails,” the court held.

    Email your news TIPS to Editor@Kahawatungu.com — this is our only official communication channel

    court of appeal
    Follow on Facebook Follow on X (Twitter)
    Share. Facebook Twitter WhatsApp LinkedIn Telegram Email
    Pinnah Mokeira

    Related Posts

    Teenage girl dies out of carbon monoxide poisoning in Salgaa

    May 16, 2026

    DCI’s FEMU undergoes international accreditation assessment 

    May 16, 2026

    Tanzanian woman robbed after stupefying incident in Ruiru

    May 16, 2026

    Comments are closed.

    Latest Posts

    US, Nigerian forces killed senior Islamic State leader, Trump says

    May 16, 2026

    How to Use Bergamot Essence for Hair Growth

    May 16, 2026

    How to Use Bendy Hair Rollers

    May 16, 2026

    How to Use Anusol

    May 16, 2026

    How to Use a Torque Wrench

    May 16, 2026

    How to Use a Dumpy Level

    May 16, 2026

    US planning to criminally indict ex-Cuban leader Raúl Castro

    May 16, 2026

    Mark Williams Net Worth

    May 16, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2026 Kahawatungu.com. Designed by Okii.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.