Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    Button
    • NEWS
    • BUSINESS
    • KNOW YOUR CELEBRITY
    • POLITICS
    • TECHNOLOGY
    • SPORTS
    • HOW-TO
    • WORLD NEWS
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    County News

    Court orders lawyer to pay Ruto’s advisor Sh1.5 million over defamation in WhatsApp group

    Pinnah MokeiraBy Pinnah MokeiraJanuary 16, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Harriet Chiggai
    Share
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Pinterest Email Copy Link

    A Milimani Commercial Courts ordered lawyer Ignatius Muhatia to pay Sh1.5 million in damages to Harriet Chiggai, the Special Advisor on Women’s Rights to the President, for defamatory statements made in a lawyers’ WhatsApp group.

    Chief Magistrate Daniel Kanyinke Ole Keiwua, in a judgment delivered virtually on January 13, 2026, found that Muhatia’s comment accusing Chiggai of “trading my body for positions” was false, malicious, and calculated to lower her reputation before over 1,000 members of the “Western Jurists Forum.”

    The dispute originated on March 22, 2023, during a heated online debate about First Lady Rachel Ruto’s adoption of 200 acres of the Kakamega Forest for restoration.

    Chiggai had explained the adoption process, prompting Muhatia to label it “wanton land grabbing.”

    The exchange escalated, with Chiggai telling Muhatia to “stop being lazy and get your facts right” and acting “like a two-year-old.” Muhatia retorted, “why are you bitter and reasoning like a 99-year-old Kukhu?… let me get mileage out of my reasoning and not by trading my body for positions. You are lucky Madam.”

    The court found that the phrase “trading my body for positions” was a clear attack on Chiggai’s professional integrity and morality, falsely implying she advanced her career through sexual favours.

    In his defence, Muhatia argued the words were not defamatory and that Chiggai failed to call witnesses to prove damage to her reputation.
    He also filed a counterclaim, alleging that her calling him a “two-year-old” was equally defamatory.

    The magistrate dismissed these arguments, stating the natural meaning of Muhatia’s words was defamatory, and witness corroboration was not a legal requirement in such a case.

    The court also dismissed Muhatia’s counterclaim, finding the insults from both parties “offensive in nature and of equal measure,” resulting in no award for him.

    While Chigai sought Sh11 million in general damages, Sh2 million in exemplary, and sh 6 million in aggravated damages, the court awarded only Sh1.5 million in general damages.

    Email your news TIPS to Editor@Kahawatungu.com — this is our only official communication channel

    Defamation Harriet Chiggai Ignatius Muhatia
    Follow on Facebook Follow on X (Twitter)
    Share. Facebook Twitter WhatsApp LinkedIn Telegram Email
    Pinnah Mokeira

    Related Posts

    EACC Probes Sh5 Million Housewarming at Vihiga Speaker’s Residence

    February 13, 2026

    Trump’s defamation lawsuit against the BBC is set to go to trial in 2027, US judge says

    February 12, 2026

    Hands off our candidates, MP Mogaka warns invigilators

    February 12, 2026

    Comments are closed.

    Latest Posts

    Kenyan embassy in Moscow warns against fraudulent job offers in Russia

    February 15, 2026

    KQ flight to Kigali makes air turn back over bad weather

    February 15, 2026

    What is Zach Galifianakis Net Worth?

    February 15, 2026

    What is Liam Lawson Net Worth?

    February 15, 2026

    What is Sergio Pérez Net Worth?

    February 15, 2026

    Plumber found dead in Machakos Town

    February 15, 2026

    What is Carlos Sainz Jr. Net Worth?

    February 15, 2026

    What is Max Verstappen Net Worth?

    February 15, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2026 Kahawatungu.com. Designed by Okii.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.