Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    Button
    • NEWS
    • BUSINESS
    • KNOW YOUR CELEBRITY
    • POLITICS
    • TECHNOLOGY
    • SPORTS
    • HOW-TO
    • WORLD NEWS
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    COURT NEWS

    Court declines to freeze lawyer’s account in Sh50 million land deal

    Pinnah MokeiraBy Pinnah MokeiraApril 25, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Email
    azimio majority
    COURT OF APPEAL.
    Share
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Pinterest Email Copy Link

    A businessman suffered a major set back after the High Court declined to freeze bank account belonging to a city law firm over Sh50 million land dispute.

    Rama Hamisi Bindo had sought orders to block transactions from Kipkenda & Company Advocates bank account held at African Banking Corporation Limited.

    Bindo alleged that the law firm breached a professional undertaking by failing to remit Sh40 million from a 2016 land deal.

    While the businessman confirmed receiving Sh10 million, he claimed the balance was being unlawfully withheld.

    He further alleged that the law firm and the seller, David Runo Kamunya, tried to avoid payment by tricking him into signing a variation Deed of Settlement in 2019, which he now disowns.

    But Kipkenda & Company Advocates argued that the agreement was voluntarily entered into and that any dispute should be resolved through arbitration, as provided for in the contract.

    The firm accused Bindo of seeking to frustrate that process by rushing to court for an asset-freezing order.

    In her ruling, Lady Justice Janet Mulwa dismissed the application, stating that Bindo had failed to demonstrate a real risk that the assets will be removed from the jurisdiction.

    The judge held that Mareva injunctions are only granted in exceptional cases backed by solid evidence of bad faith or fraud.

    “Upon careful consideration, the court is not persuaded that the plaintiff/applicant has met the tests and threshold for grant of a Mareva Injunction there being no special circumstances demonstrated to persuade the court exercise its powers in his favour, at the interlocutory stage,” Mulwa ruled.

    Email your news TIPS to Editor@Kahawatungu.com — this is our only official communication channel

    Follow on Facebook Follow on X (Twitter)
    Share. Facebook Twitter WhatsApp LinkedIn Telegram Email
    Pinnah Mokeira

    Related Posts

    Court stops removal of FKF committee member Yusuf

    April 28, 2026

    “I Said What I Believed Was True” Sonko Tells Court in Defamation Case

    April 27, 2026

    Paradise Lost land owners link top government officials to illegal occupation

    April 25, 2026

    Comments are closed.

    Latest Posts

    Mikko Rantanen Siblings: All About Laura and Noora Rantanen

    May 1, 2026

    Hegseth says clock paused on deadline to seek approval for Iran war

    May 1, 2026

    Apple says iPhone 17 ‘most popular ever’ as sales soar

    May 1, 2026

    Miro Heiskanen Siblings: Getting to Know Miira Heiskanen

    May 1, 2026

    Water Supply Disrupted in Parts of Nairobi After Pipeline Burst

    May 1, 2026

    Ruto to address Tanzanian Parliament

    May 1, 2026

    Jason Robertson Siblings: Meet Brianne and Nicholas Robertson

    May 1, 2026

    Ruto increases salary for workers by 12%

    May 1, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2026 Kahawatungu.com. Designed by Okii.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.