Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    Button
    • NEWS
    • BUSINESS
    • KNOW YOUR CELEBRITY
    • POLITICS
    • TECHNOLOGY
    • SPORTS
    • HOW-TO
    • WORLD NEWS
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    COURT NEWS

    Court declines to freeze lawyer’s account in Sh50 million land deal

    Pinnah MokeiraBy Pinnah MokeiraApril 25, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Email
    azimio majority
    COURT OF APPEAL.
    Share
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Pinterest Email Copy Link

    A businessman suffered a major set back after the High Court declined to freeze bank account belonging to a city law firm over Sh50 million land dispute.

    Rama Hamisi Bindo had sought orders to block transactions from Kipkenda & Company Advocates bank account held at African Banking Corporation Limited.

    Bindo alleged that the law firm breached a professional undertaking by failing to remit Sh40 million from a 2016 land deal.

    While the businessman confirmed receiving Sh10 million, he claimed the balance was being unlawfully withheld.

    He further alleged that the law firm and the seller, David Runo Kamunya, tried to avoid payment by tricking him into signing a variation Deed of Settlement in 2019, which he now disowns.

    But Kipkenda & Company Advocates argued that the agreement was voluntarily entered into and that any dispute should be resolved through arbitration, as provided for in the contract.

    The firm accused Bindo of seeking to frustrate that process by rushing to court for an asset-freezing order.

    In her ruling, Lady Justice Janet Mulwa dismissed the application, stating that Bindo had failed to demonstrate a real risk that the assets will be removed from the jurisdiction.

    The judge held that Mareva injunctions are only granted in exceptional cases backed by solid evidence of bad faith or fraud.

    “Upon careful consideration, the court is not persuaded that the plaintiff/applicant has met the tests and threshold for grant of a Mareva Injunction there being no special circumstances demonstrated to persuade the court exercise its powers in his favour, at the interlocutory stage,” Mulwa ruled.

    Email your news TIPS to Editor@Kahawatungu.com — this is our only official communication channel

    Follow on Facebook Follow on X (Twitter)
    Share. Facebook Twitter WhatsApp LinkedIn Telegram Email
    Pinnah Mokeira

    Related Posts

    Parents of school in Mukuru slums to challenge ruling on its management c

    June 30, 2026

    Two petitions filed to challenge implementation vehicle inspection rules by NTSA

    June 29, 2026

    Cape Holdings allowed to amend petition challenging enforcement of Sh10 billion decretal sum

    June 29, 2026

    Comments are closed.

    Latest Posts

    Cabinet approves Kenya’s accession to two international anti-mercenary treaties

    June 30, 2026

    Cabinet approves reforms to dismantle deeply entrenched and decades-long payroll fraud

    June 30, 2026

    Cabinet establishes committee on AI

    June 30, 2026

    Cabinet endorses cooperation agreement with Rwanda, South Sudan on fuel importation

    June 30, 2026

    Court orders Ruto to reconstitute Cabinet in 120 days over gender rule breach

    June 30, 2026

    EACC arrests Nyamira County Assembly Deputy Clerk over Sh30 million tender scandal

    June 30, 2026

    Supreme Court agrees to review ban on AR-style semi-automatic rifles in major Second Amendment case

    June 30, 2026

    UK government says it’s likely to challenge $110 billion Paramount-Warner Bros. merger

    June 30, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2026 Kahawatungu.com. Designed by Okii.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.