Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    Button
    • NEWS
    • BUSINESS
    • KNOW YOUR CELEBRITY
    • POLITICS
    • TECHNOLOGY
    • SPORTS
    • HOW-TO
    • WORLD NEWS
    KahawatunguKahawatungu
    COURT NEWS

    Kisumu High Court upholds DPP’s prosecutorial independence in aircraft forgery case

    David WafulaBy David WafulaAugust 4, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Email
    Court
    Share
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Telegram Pinterest Email Copy Link

    The High Court in Kisumu upheld the constitutional independence of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) after dismissing a petition by four foreign nationals seeking to stop their prosecution over an alleged aircraft forgery scheme.

    In a judgment delivered by Justice Joe M. Omido, the Court dismissed in its entirety a petition filed by Alfred Geoffrey Leach, David Berry, Michael Allan McKeever and Christopher Bruce Wilhelm, who had sought orders to quash criminal proceedings pending against them in Kisumu.

    The petitioners are charged with forgery contrary to Section 349 of the Penal Code and conspiracy to commit a felony contrary to Section 393 of the Penal Code.

    The charges stem from a 2014 aircraft sale and leasing transaction between Wilken Aviation Limited and Flying Tiger Oversize Cargo Pty Ltd that later resulted in disputes over the aircraft’s registration, deregistration and maintenance.

    The petitioners had argued that the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) and DPP violated their constitutional rights by investigating, arresting and charging them without prior notice, summoning them to record statements or giving them an opportunity to be heard.

    They also maintained that the matter was purely commercial and relied on an Interpol decision deleting certain data linked to a red notice issued against one of them.

    Prosecution Counsel Mercy Mutheu Muema submitted that the DPP acted within the powers conferred by Article 157 of the Constitution and that neither the Constitution nor statute requires suspects to be interviewed before charges are preferred.

    Justice Omido held that there was no evidence of constitutional violations and ruled that the existence of a commercial dispute does not shield parties from criminal liability where evidence discloses an offence.

    The Court further found that constitutional litigation cannot be used as a substitute for a criminal trial.

    The petition was dismissed with costs awarded to the DPP, clearing the way for the criminal proceedings in Kisumu to continue.

    Email your news TIPS to Editor@Kahawatungu.com — this is our only official communication channel

    Follow on Facebook Follow on X (Twitter)
    Share. Facebook Twitter WhatsApp LinkedIn Telegram Email
    David Wafula

    Related Posts

    Court stops burial of late KCB boss Rosemary Koech 

    August 28, 2026

    Court acquits clinical officer accused of raping dialysis patient in Mombasa

    August 25, 2026

    Sonko vows to appeal Sh385 million tax dispute in High Court

    August 25, 2026

    Comments are closed.

    Latest Posts

    Man, 53, murdered, body dumped and set ablaze in Nyamira banana plantation

    August 30, 2026

    Barcelona close to deal for Arsenal’s Jesus

    August 30, 2026

    Two suspects arrested, hotel property recovered after Homa Bay Tourist Hotel attack

    August 30, 2026

    Man, 34, beheaded in Bungoma murder incident

    August 30, 2026

    Two-year-old boy drowns in dam in Nyandarua village

    August 30, 2026

    At least seven dead and more missing after boat carrying hundreds capsizes off Cyprus

    August 30, 2026

    Iceland votes against restarting talks on joining EU

    August 30, 2026

    Manhunt in Switzerland after fatal rave shooting

    August 30, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2026 Kahawatungu.com. Designed by Okii.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.